Current:Home > MyRobert Brown|Judge allows disabled voters in Wisconsin to electronically vote from home -Blueprint Money Mastery
Robert Brown|Judge allows disabled voters in Wisconsin to electronically vote from home
Robert Brown View
Date:2025-04-07 22:04:42
MADISON,Robert Brown Wis. (AP) — Local election officials in battleground state Wisconsin will be allowed to send absentee ballots to disabled voters electronically in November’s presidential election, a judge ruled Tuesday.
Dane County Circuit Judge Everett Mitchell issued a temporary injunction that allows voters who self-certify that they can’t read or mark a paper ballot without help to request absentee ballots electronically from local clerks. The voters can then cast their ballots at home using devices that help them read and write independently. They will still be required to mail the ballots back to the clerks or return them in person, the same as any other absentee voter in the state.
The injunction is part of a larger lawsuit that advocates for disabled voters filed in April. The plaintiffs argued in the filing that many people with disabilities can’t cast paper ballots without assistance, compromising their right to cast a secret ballot, and struggle to return ballots through the mail or in-person.
Any eligible voter can vote by paper absentee ballot in Wisconsin. Anyone could request an absentee ballot electronically until 2011, when then-Gov. Scott Walker signed a Republican-authored law that allowed only military and overseas voters to use that method.
Attorney General Josh Kaul, a Democrat, opposes allowing disabled voters to request electronic absentee ballots. His lawyers argued during a hearing on Monday that state election officials don’t have time before November to train Wisconsin’s roughly 1,800 local clerks in how to handle electronic ballot requests from disabled voters and create ballots that can interact with the voters’ assistive devices. They warned the move would only create confusion and raise security risks.
The plaintiffs countered that an electronic ballot delivery system already exists for military and overseas voters and disabled voters deserve the same treatment. They also have a constitutional right to cast a secret ballot, they maintained.
The plaintiffs’ lawsuit also asks that Mitchell let disabled voters return their absentee ballots electronically, an accommodation no other absentee voter in the state is permitted. They did not include that ask in their request for the injunction after Wisconsin Elections Commission Administrator Meagan Wolfe testified the set-up would take months, but the demand remains in play as the judge considers the merits of the case going forward.
State Justice Department spokesperson Gillian Drummond had no immediate comment on the injunction.
Questions over who can cast absentee ballots and how have become a political flashpoint in Wisconsin, where four of the past six presidential elections have been decided by less than a percentage point.
People with disabilities make up about a quarter of the U.S. adult population, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. A little more than a million Wisconsin adults, or one in four, are disabled, defined by the CDC as having difficulty with mobility, cognition, independent living, hearing, seeing, dressing or bathing.
Disabled people have engaged in several legal battles in recent years over access to the polls, as many Republican-led states have restricted how and when people can vote. Among the issues they have fought are limits on the types of assistance a voter can receive and whether someone else can return a voter’s mailed ballot.
Nearly 100,000 Wisconsin adults suffer from vision difficulties, according to statistics compiled by state health officials. A little more than 307,000 adults have difficulty moving, including difficulty walking, climbing stairs, reaching, lifting or carrying things.
Doug Poland, one of the attorneys for the plaintiffs, said he has no estimates of how many disabled people who haven’t voted in the past because they couldn’t fill out absentee ballots on their own may vote in November thanks to the injunction.
veryGood! (55812)
Related
- North Carolina justices rule for restaurants in COVID
- Canada wildfires force evacuation of 30,000 in scorched Alberta
- Why Jana Kramer Believes Her Ex-Husband Would Have Cheated Forever If They Stay Married
- South Carolina doctors give young Ukraine war refugee the gift of sound
- Civic engagement nonprofits say democracy needs support in between big elections. Do funders agree?
- Elon Musk says Twitter bankruptcy is possible, but is that likely?
- U.S. bans the sale and import of some tech from Chinese companies Huawei and ZTE
- Pakistan riots over Imran Khan's arrest continue as army deployed, 8 people killed in clashes
- Krispy Kreme offers a free dozen Grinch green doughnuts: When to get the deal
- France launches war crime investigation after reporter Arman Soldin killed in Ukraine
Ranking
- The 401(k) millionaires club keeps growing. We'll tell you how to join.
- Sephora 24-Hour Flash Sale: 50% Off Foreo and More
- Fears of crypto contagion are growing as another company's finances wobble
- Ed Sheeran Shares Name of Baby No. 2 With Wife Cherry Seaborn
- Elon Musk's skyrocketing net worth: He's the first person with over $400 billion
- Wild koalas get chlamydia vaccine in first-of-its kind trial to protect the beloved marsupials
- Video games are tough on you because they love you
- Elon Musk expected to begin mass Twitter layoffs
Recommendation
Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Hi Hi!
Meet The Everyday Crypto Investors Caught Up In The FTX Implosion
Woman detained in connection with shooting deaths of two NYU students in Puerto Rico
Elon Musk says Twitter restored Ye's account without his knowledge before acquisition
See you latte: Starbucks plans to cut 30% of its menu
'The Callisto Protocol' Review: Guts, Death, and Robots
TikToker Jehane Thomas Dead at 30
How the Glamorous Hairstyles on Marie Antoinette Tell Their Own Stories